From [email protected] Thu Jul 22 20:37:55 1999
Flags: 10
Return-Path: [email protected]
Received: from arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu ([email protected] [129.22.8.215]) by odin.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.6+cwru/CWRU-2.4-ins)
	id UAA25349; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:54 -0400 (EDT) (from [email protected] for <[email protected]>)
Received: from nike.ins.cwru.edu ([email protected] [129.22.8.219]) by arthur.INS.CWRU.Edu with ESMTP (8.8.8+cwru/CWRU-3.6)
	id UAA05311; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:51 -0400 (EDT) (from [email protected] for <[email protected]>)
Received: from pele.santafe.edu (pele.santafe.edu [192.12.12.119]) by nike.ins.cwru.edu with ESMTP (8.8.7/CWRU-2.5-bsdi)
	id UAA13350; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 20:37:50 -0400 (EDT) (from [email protected] for <[email protected]>)
Received: from wijiji.santafe.edu (wijiji [192.12.12.5])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10831
	for <[email protected]>; Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:47 -0600 (MDT)
Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by wijiji.santafe.edu (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) id SAA01089;
	Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 18:37:46 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <[email protected]>
X-Authentication-Warning: wijiji.santafe.edu: rms set sender to [email protected] using -f
From: Richard Stallman <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Use of Readline
Reply-to: [email protected]

I think Allbery's suggestion is a good one.  So please add this text
in a suitable place.  Please don't put it in the GPL itself; that
should be the same as the GPL everywhere else.  Putting it in the
README and/or the documentation would be a good idea.


======================================================================
Our position on the use of Readline through a shared-library linking
mechanism is that there is no legal difference between shared-library
linking and static linking--either kind of linking combines various
modules into a single larger work.  The conditions for using Readline
in a larger work are stated in section 3 of the GNU GPL.